Hail to the CEO
President Obama annouces the bankruptcy filing of General Motors today at the White House. The restructuring plan for the auto giant includes a 60% stake in the company by the government of the United States.
Barack Obama, a man who’s never held an executive position, has essentially become the Chief Executive Office of the world’s largest bank/mortgage lender/automaker.
The question now, besides the location of the section of the Constitution that gives the federal government the power to take ownership interests in private enterprises, is how far the government will go to keep GM afloat if the $50 billion already committed isn’t enough. Making cars is one thing; selling 10 million a year to stay profitable is another.
And not to unfairly criticize hard-working government employees, but the simple fact is that the government is not bound by the same rules of profit and loss as the rest of us. Inefficiency does not hold the same consequences for government — or for GSEs like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and now Chrysler and GM — as it does for the local small business.
This is a bad idea, an albatross that’s going to be around our necks for a long time.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Derek on June 1, 2009 at 7:44 am, and is filed under Life, News. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
No trackbacks yet.
To boldly go where no man has…oh, wait, it says “Mecca”
about 3 weeks ago - 1 comment
My eyes have just rolled up into my head. Just when I start to cut President Obama some slack, a story like this comes along. You’d think our space agency’s prime directive would be to, you know, explore space. Under the Obama administration, however, it seems the mission is a bit more down-to-Earth: NASA Administrator
Column: Appoint For Us a King
about 4 weeks ago - 1 comment
In a development little noticed by the American public, President Obama’s subordinates have quietly let it be known that he reserves the right to have American citizens overseas assassinated. Not imprisoned. Not spied upon without a warrant. Killed in cold blood with no oversight whatsoever. Read the rest at Hearken the Watchmen.
The big question
about 1 month ago - 1 comment
Glenn Greenwald has another excellent column at Salon.com on the imperial presidency. Where is the outcry from so-called conservatives over President Obama’s claim of authority to order the assassination of American citizens without oversight of any kind? That’s right. This administration has a secret hit list of “dozens” of American citizens considered a threat. Aside
McChrystal knew what he was doing
about 1 month ago - 4 comments
Gen Stanley McChrystal didn’t rise to his position in the Army by being an idiot. He had to know what would happen when he allowed himself and his staff to speak freely around a reporter, especially one writing for a publication like Rolling Stone. So this explanation of “poor judgment” just doesn’t wash. Anyone over
VFTB 044: Paul & Phillip Collins — Obama, Transformer or Technocrat? / The Information Cartel
about 3 months ago - 2 comments
BARACK OBAMA is on a political roll, finally getting his health care reform bill and preparing to push through (equally unpopular) legislation on climate change and immigration reform. But can President Obama — or any president — really offer change?
Obama out of touch
about 6 months ago - No comments
And even while he says he gets it, the president doesn’t realize how out of touch he is: “If there’s one thing that I regret this year is that we were so busy just getting stuff done and dealing with the immediate crises that were in front of us that I think we lost some
No thaw
about 6 months ago - 3 comments
A snapshot from the heartland: a funny thing happened on the way to the building site: According to [Shelbyville, Indiana city building commission] records, only 115 building permits were issued by the city last year. That is almost half the number issued the year before and a third of the total issued in 2005, two
History repeats: Obama = Hoover
about 7 months ago - No comments
From the Mises Economics Blog: “My main message in today’s meeting was very simple: that America’s banks received extraordinary assistance from American taxpayers to rebuild their industry and now that they’re back on their feet, we expect an extraordinary commitment from them to help rebuild our economy,” President Obama said after the meeting. In the
Bring them home
about 7 months ago - 1 comment
The sooner we get out of Afghanistan, the better. When we have to pay the Taliban a billion dollars a year to protect our supply convoys, it’s time to leave.
This explains a lot
about 8 months ago - No comments
Since over 80% of Americans work in the private sector, how is it that President Obama found so few with private sector experience worth appointing to key economic Cabinet posts?



about 1 year ago
hey! I was listening to some local frequency modulated radio talk show this morning, some Tom Bradley guy, if that is his real name…….
he reiterated that we now own some 60% of GM.
well, I could use a little extra cash just about now. where do I go to cash in “my” share?
a government with the wrong KIND of power will inevitably attract the wrong kind of people to run it. that is where we are. Democratic Socialists, am I talking about Nazi Germany, or these United States presently?
answer: “yes”
about 1 year ago
I like the new look of your website, I have always admired your courage to take a Christian stand on all issues.
These are just a couple of thoughts for your younger readers/listeners-those that are too young to remember who the participants were in the last world war and the “cold war”. In all the “Change” that is being talked about, sometimes praised and sometimes criticized, I have never heard either of these two terms used. Of course, I suppose the fact that I don’t watch TV news or read newspapers limits my ability to say what the media is or isn’t saying.
Anyway, consider the definitions of these two words and compare them to what’s happening at GM, etc.
Fascism-a governmental system with strong centralized power, permitting no opposition or criticism, controlling all affairs of the nation (industrial, commercial, etc), emphasizing an aggressive nationalism, and often anticommunist. (American Collegiate Dictionary)
Socialism-a theory or system of social organization which advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production, capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole (American Collegiate Dictionary)
As I was typing these definitions I had some time to think (I type really slowly) and have decided that the problem may be that people, young or old, do understand these definitions and how they are being fleshed out in the United States today-it’s just that they have forgotten what nations and leaders championed these systems in the past; and that we have all been indoctrinated into believing that the “dirty, nasty, greedy, evil capitalists” are the cause for all of our problems and that bigger government is the answer to our problems.
God forgive us for forgetting that “All good things come from above…”.
about 1 year ago
Glad to see some people still have a head on their shoulders. Barrack is in over his head. imho.