The big question
Glenn Greenwald has another excellent column at Salon.com on the imperial presidency. Where is the outcry from so-called conservatives over President Obama’s claim of authority to order the assassination of American citizens without oversight of any kind?
That’s right. This administration has a secret hit list of “dozens” of American citizens considered a threat. Aside from Keith Olbermann, of all people, and a couple of passing mentions in The Washington Post and the New York Times, this is a story that’s gone MIA from the major media.
Here’s the big question from Greenwald for Obama supporters:
[I]f you’re someone who believes, or are at least willing to acquiesce to the claim, that the U.S. President has the power to target your fellow citizens for assassination without a whiff of due process, what unchecked presidential powers wouldn’t you support or acquiesce to? I’d really like to hear an answer to that. That’s the question Al Gore asked about George Bush in a 2006 speech condemning Bush’s claimed powers merely to eavesdrop on and imprison American citizens without charges, let alone assassinate them: “If the answer is yes, then under the theory by which these acts are committed, are there any acts that can on their face be prohibited? . . . If the president has th[is] inherent authority. . . . then what can’t he do?”
Can anyone defending this Obama policy answer that question?
| Print article | This entry was posted by Derek on June 28, 2010 at 7:27 am, and is filed under News, Politics. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
No comments yet.
New column
about 3 weeks ago - No comments
Again, a blog post serves as the seed for a new column: [The Obamas] proved conclusively last week that they’re either completely devoid of empathy or absolutely, positively clueless… Either [the president] and his picked team are idiots or they’re completely insensitive to the needs, fears, and anxieties of anyone outside their circle. Read the
New column
about 3 weeks ago - 1 comment
Again, a blog post serves as the seed for a new column: [President] Obama proved conclusively last week that they’re either completely devoid of empathy or absolutely, positively clueless… Either Obama and his picked team are idiots or they’re completely insensitive to the needs, fears, and anxieties of anyone outside their circle. Read the rest
To boldly go where no man has…oh, wait, it says “Mecca”
about 2 months ago - 2 comments
My eyes have just rolled up into my head. Just when I start to cut President Obama some slack, a story like this comes along. You’d think our space agency’s prime directive would be to, you know, explore space. Under the Obama administration, however, it seems the mission is a bit more down-to-Earth: NASA Administrator
Column: Appoint For Us a King
about 2 months ago - 1 comment
In a development little noticed by the American public, President Obama’s subordinates have quietly let it be known that he reserves the right to have American citizens overseas assassinated. Not imprisoned. Not spied upon without a warrant. Killed in cold blood with no oversight whatsoever. Read the rest at Hearken the Watchmen.
McChrystal knew what he was doing
about 2 months ago - 4 comments
Gen Stanley McChrystal didn’t rise to his position in the Army by being an idiot. He had to know what would happen when he allowed himself and his staff to speak freely around a reporter, especially one writing for a publication like Rolling Stone. So this explanation of “poor judgment” just doesn’t wash. Anyone over
VFTB 044: Paul & Phillip Collins — Obama, Transformer or Technocrat? / The Information Cartel
about 4 months ago - 2 comments
BARACK OBAMA is on a political roll, finally getting his health care reform bill and preparing to push through (equally unpopular) legislation on climate change and immigration reform. But can President Obama — or any president — really offer change?
Obama out of touch
about 7 months ago - No comments
And even while he says he gets it, the president doesn’t realize how out of touch he is: “If there’s one thing that I regret this year is that we were so busy just getting stuff done and dealing with the immediate crises that were in front of us that I think we lost some
History repeats: Obama = Hoover
about 8 months ago - No comments
From the Mises Economics Blog: “My main message in today’s meeting was very simple: that America’s banks received extraordinary assistance from American taxpayers to rebuild their industry and now that they’re back on their feet, we expect an extraordinary commitment from them to help rebuild our economy,” President Obama said after the meeting. In the
Bring them home
about 9 months ago - 1 comment
The sooner we get out of Afghanistan, the better. When we have to pay the Taliban a billion dollars a year to protect our supply convoys, it’s time to leave.
This explains a lot
about 9 months ago - No comments
Since over 80% of Americans work in the private sector, how is it that President Obama found so few with private sector experience worth appointing to key economic Cabinet posts?



